sb_rollback_storage_box_to_snapshot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses destructive nature: 'Existing data after that snapshot is lost.' No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. Lacks details on irreversibility, permissions, or effect on other snapshots.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no fluff. Warning is important and front-loaded. Could be slightly more structured with parameter details while maintaining brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive rollback operation, missing crucial context: prerequisites (e.g., existing snapshot), output format (though output schema exists but not shown), and safeguards. Minimal coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 2 parameters with 0% description coverage. Description does not explain what storage_box_id and snapshot_id represent, no format or validation hints beyond the tool name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the verb 'Rollback' and resource 'Storage Box to a snapshot', with a warning about data loss. Distinguishes from sibling tools like sb_create_snapshot, sb_delete_snapshot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternatives. The warning about data loss implies caution but does not guide which snapshot to pick or compare with other snapshot operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.