cloud_get_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It merely implies a read operation ('get') but does not explicitly state idempotency, authorization needs, or any side effects. Important details like rate limits or error conditions are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no superfluous words. Every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (1 parameter, output schema present), the description is minimally adequate but lacks context such as the structure of the returned action. It does not capitalize on the output schema to reduce explanation needs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The action_id parameter has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description adds no additional semantic value beyond the parameter name. It does not suggest how to obtain a valid ID or any constraints on it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a single action by ID' clearly states the specific verb ('get'), resource ('action'), and the identifying criterion ('by ID'). It distinguishes from siblings like cloud_list_actions by indicating individual retrieval.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. The description does not mention that cloud_list_actions should be used to find action IDs, nor does it specify any prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.