cloud_disable_server_rescue

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description lacks details on side effects (e.g., server status changes), prerequisites (server must be in rescue mode), or return value. The agent is left without critical context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but may be too terse. It could include more useful information without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no annotations, the description should cover prerequisites, post-action state, and error conditions. It only states the basic function, leaving the agent uninformed about the rest of the interaction.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, 'server_id', has no description in the schema (0% coverage). The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the parameter name, which is self-explanatory but lacks context (e.g., format or how to obtain it).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Disable') and the resource ('rescue mode for a cloud server'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'cloud_enable_server_rescue'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to turn off rescue mode, but it does not specify when to use it (e.g., after rescue actions are complete) or contrast with alternatives like power commands.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.