dns_update_zone
Update a DNS zone's name or TTL to manage domain DNS configuration.
Instructions
Update a DNS zone.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| zone_id | Yes | ||
| name | No | ||
| ttl | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Update a DNS zone's name or TTL to manage domain DNS configuration.
Update a DNS zone.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| zone_id | Yes | ||
| name | No | ||
| ttl | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, error handling, auth requirements, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but at the expense of essential information. The single sentence lacks detail needed for correct tool usage.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite having an output schema and 3 parameters, the description is too minimal to provide a complete understanding. No mention of return values, effects, or typical use cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of the zone_id, name, or ttl parameters. Agent cannot infer parameter meaning from description alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it updates a DNS zone, distinguishing it from create/delete/get zones. However, it doesn't specify which attributes can be updated (name, TTL).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like dns_update_record or dns_create_zone. No context on prerequisites or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ginkelsoft-development/mcp-hetzner'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server