cloud_detach_server_from_network

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description provides no behavioral traits beyond the basic action. No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden, but it does not disclose side effects, system actions, required permissions, or whether the operation is reversible. This is critical for a mutation operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but under-specified. It omits necessary details for proper tool use, making it insufficient for an agent to invoke correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema exists (reducing the need to describe return values), the description fails to cover essential usage context, parameter semantics, and behavioral effects. The tool is simple but the description is incomplete for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain what server_id and network_id represent or how to obtain valid values. While the parameter names are intuitive, no additional meaning is provided to aid the agent in selecting correct values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Detach a server from a private network.' The verb 'detach' and resource 'server' are specific, and the sibling 'cloud_attach_server_to_network' semantically differentiates via opposite verb. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from siblings beyond the verb choice.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites (e.g., server must be connected to the network), or alternatives. The description lacks any context for appropriate invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.