mcp-hetzner
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-hetzner
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Hetzner. Enables managing cloud projects, account resources, and dedicated servers, with the entire REST API reachable through a searchable tool catalog.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables users to manage Hetzner Cloud resources including servers, load balancers, and volumes through natural language commands. It facilitates infrastructure operations such as resource creation, security configuration, and real-time pricing queries within AI-powered environments.71 npm1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents like Mistral Work to manage Hetzner Cloud VPS services in natural Spanish, including creating, modifying, and deleting servers, networks, firewalls, and storage, as well as automating complex tasks.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables management of Hetzner Cloud resources including servers, SSH keys, volumes, storage boxes, and live metrics through 40 tools.13 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server for full Hetzner Cloud + Storage API automation. Exposes all official Hetzner operations as MCP tools so AI agents can manage servers, networking, load balancers, firewalls, volumes, DNS zones, and storage boxes from one server.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables full operational control over Contabo VPS/VDS infrastructure through natural language, including instances, DNS, snapshots, and more with 57 tools.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 137 tools
All tools have clearly distinct purposes through specific verb-noun combinations and detailed descriptions. Even for similar resources (e.g., load balancer services vs targets), the actions are unique and well-defined.
Tool names follow a consistent pattern: prefix indicating service (cloud_, dns_, sb_, hetzner_) + verb + noun in snake_case. The verb tense is uniform (imperative present) and the structure is predictable across all 137 tools.
With 137 tools, the server is extremely large and exceeds the typical scope for a single MCP server. While the tools are necessary for complete Hetzner API coverage, the count is far beyond the recommended range and would benefit from decomposition into separate servers per service domain.
The tool set offers comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle operations for all exposed Hetzner services: compute, networking, storage, DNS, firewalls, load balancers, and more. No obvious gaps are present for the intended domain coverage.