update_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only says 'update', implying modification, but fails to disclose behavioral traits such as whether it performs a partial update, requires specific permissions, or has irreversible effects. Important gaps for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence, 11 words) with no redundant information. However, the extreme brevity sacrifices essential details, making it less useful despite being efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 6 parameters (including a nested object), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain return values, required vs optional fields beyond workspace_id, or behavior of the settings object. Incomplete for effective tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33% (2 of 6 parameters described). The description lists some updatable fields (name, description, brand voice), adding value beyond the schema, but does not explain constraints, formats, or the nested 'settings' object in detail. The description partially compensates but is insufficient for full clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'update' and the resource 'workspace settings', listing specific fields like name, description, and brand voice. It distinguishes from sibling tools such as get_workspace (read) and create_workspace (implicitly present).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_workspace for new workspaces, get_workspace for reading). No context about prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.