delete_api_key
Revoke and delete an API key by providing its UUID to permanently remove access.
Instructions
Revoke and delete an API key
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | API key UUID |
Revoke and delete an API key by providing its UUID to permanently remove access.
Revoke and delete an API key
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | API key UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions 'revoke and delete' but does not state that the action is irreversible, the permissions required, or the impact on services using the key.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise with no wasted words. However, it lacks critical behavioral information, making it slightly over-condensed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not address the destructive nature, reversibility, or post-deletion effects, which are essential for a delete tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'id' (described as 'API key UUID'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, earning the baseline score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Revoke and delete an API key' uses specific verbs and clearly identifies the resource. Among sibling tools like 'create_api_key' and 'list_api_keys', this tool is unambiguously the deletion counterpart.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It lacks prerequisites, exclusions, or context such as 'use only for API keys that are no longer needed'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ejwhite7/olli-social-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server