delete_team
Delete a team from a workspace by providing the workspace slug or UUID and the team UUID.
Instructions
Delete a team
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | Workspace slug or UUID | |
| id | Yes | Team UUID |
Delete a team from a workspace by providing the workspace slug or UUID and the team UUID.
Delete a team
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| workspace_id | Yes | Workspace slug or UUID | |
| id | Yes | Team UUID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must convey behavioral traits. It only states the action without disclosing side effects (e.g., cascading deletes, irreversibility, auth requirements).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (3 words) with no extraneous information; front-loaded and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a delete operation, the description lacks crucial context such as success behavior, permission requirements, and impact on related entities. Incomplete given the tool's potential side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline for high coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a team' uses a specific verb (Delete) and resource (team), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_team, update_team, or add_team_member.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., remove_team_member, update_team), nor any prerequisites or conditions for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ejwhite7/olli-social-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server