create_icp

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations and only a terse description, there is no disclosure of behavioral traits like side effects, permissions required, or what happens upon creation (e.g., whether it returns the created object).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short at one sentence, but it lacks substantive detail. While it is front-loaded, it sacrifices informativeness for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters (including a nested object), no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide necessary context about constraints, return values, or behavior. It is insufficient for an AI agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75% (3 of 4 parameters have descriptions). The tool description adds no further meaning beyond the schema, but the schema itself is adequate for basic understanding. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create an ICP' clearly indicates a create action on an ICP resource, and distinguishes from siblings like update_icp and delete_icp. However, it assumes domain knowledge of what 'ICP' stands for, which may not be universal.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs. alternatives, such as when to create vs. update an ICP. There is no mention of prerequisites or context for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.