arvan_vod_delete_video
Delete a VOD video using its unique identifier.
Instructions
Delete a VOD video by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| video_id | Yes |
Delete a VOD video using its unique identifier.
Delete a VOD video by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| video_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description correctly states it's a deletion, consistent with annotations, but adds no additional behavioral context like irreversibility or permission requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise (6 words), but this conciseness comes at the cost of helpful detail. It is not verbose, but the description barely earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given low complexity (1 param, no output schema), the description should still explain where to obtain the video ID or what happens after deletion. It lacks this context, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only says 'by id,' giving minimal guidance. The agent gets no format or source for the video_id parameter beyond the title.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (VOD video), distinguishing it from sibling delete tools for other VOD entities. However, it adds little beyond the tool name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus other VOD delete tools, nor any prerequisites or conditions (e.g., video must exist, consequences of deletion).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dwin-gharibi/arvancloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server