arvan_live_list_inputs
List all inputs and streams configured for a live channel using its channel ID.
Instructions
List the inputs/streams configured for a live channel.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| channel_id | Yes |
List all inputs and streams configured for a live channel using its channel ID.
List the inputs/streams configured for a live channel.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| channel_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true. Description adds no extra behavioral details beyond 'List', such as pagination or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence, efficiently stating purpose. Could benefit from slightly more detail without losing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple list tool with few parameters and no output schema, but lacks return format or edge-case information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Single required parameter channel_id is not explained in description or schema. Agent must infer meaning from tool name alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists inputs/streams for a live channel, using specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like arvan_live_list_channels.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, prerequisites, or context. Only states the function.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dwin-gharibi/arvancloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server