arvan_create_metric_exporter

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate this is not read-only, not destructive, and not idempotent. The description only says 'create', implying mutation but without additional context such as whether creating a duplicate exporter is allowed or what the side effects are. More behavioral detail is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it lacks essential details about the parameters and usage, leading to a trade-off between brevity and informativeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the tool (two required parameters, one being a nested object) and the lack of output schema or parameter descriptions, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain what a metric exporter is, what the config should contain, or what the tool returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate. It does not explain the meaning of 'domain' or 'config'. The 'config' parameter is an opaque object with additionalProperties true, making the description incomplete for tool selection.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'create' and the resource 'metric exporter' scoped to 'a domain'. It distinguishes the tool from sibling tools that create other resources (e.g., DNS records, servers). However, it does not explain what a metric exporter is, which could add clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other create tools or related metric tools like arvan_list_metric_exporters or arvan_metrics. There is no mention of prerequisites or scenarios to avoid.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.