arvan_vod_create_audio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond annotations. It implies a non-readonly, destructive operation (creating), but does not disclose potential side effects, authentication needs, or constraints (e.g., channel must exist).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence and concise, but the brevity sacrifices necessary detail, especially regarding the 'fields' parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a nested object parameter ('fields') with no schema descriptions, and no output schema. The description fails to explain the fields structure or the return value, leaving significant gaps for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not explain the 'fields' parameter beyond its name. Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description should provide details about the expected structure of the fields object, but it does not. The channel_id is self-explanatory but still lacks context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create) and resource (audio item) and context (in a channel). It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_video or create_subtitle by specifying 'audio'. However, it could be more precise about the VOD context already implied by the tool name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create_video, create_subtitle). No prerequisites or scenarios described.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.