arvan_vod_delete_audio
Remove a specific audio file from your VOD library using its audio ID.
Instructions
Delete an audio item by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| audio_id | Yes |
Remove a specific audio file from your VOD library using its audio ID.
Delete an audio item by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| audio_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the description adds no behavioral context beyond the action. It does not contradict annotations, but lacks additional disclosure (e.g., irreversibility, permissions).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words, directly states purpose. Front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details like irreversibility or permission requirements that would make it fully complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only says 'by id' without specifying format or source of audio_id, adding minimal meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'an audio item', and specifies identification method 'by id'. It distinguishes from sibling delete tools (e.g., arvan_vod_delete_video) by targeting audio specifically.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or conditions. The sibling set includes many delete operations but the description provides no differentiation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/dwin-gharibi/arvancloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server