arvan_create_log_forwarder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description claims a create/write operation, but the annotation says readOnlyHint: true, which is a contradiction. No additional behavioral context is provided (e.g., side effects, required permissions).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (one sentence) and to the point, but it could be slightly expanded without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, only 2 params but both required and one is a complex object. The description lacks details on the sink configuration, making it insufficient for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'domain' or 'config' parameters. The context says the config is an object with additionalProperties: true, but no guidance on required fields or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('log forwarder'), and provides a clarifying parenthetical explaining it ships access logs to an external sink. It distinguishes from sibling tools like arvan_list_log_forwarders or arvan_delete_log_forwarder.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites (e.g., need an external sink endpoint), and no mention of when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.