release_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes key behavioral traits: task returns to open status and becomes immediately claimable, handoff note behavior. Without annotations, this is good but could mention permissions or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with zero waste. Front-loaded with purpose, each sentence earns its place by explaining usage, handoff note, and API environment.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description is complete enough. Covers the action, effect, and handoff note. Could mention prerequisites like task must be claimed by the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Adds value beyond schema by explaining the purpose of 'handoff' and default behavior when omitted. Schema coverage is 100% but the description enriches understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb 'release' and resource 'task you have claimed' clearly state the action. Contrasts with sibling tools like 'claim_task' or 'complete_task' by specifying the context of releasing a claimed task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use when you cannot finish the work or another agent should take over', providing clear usage context. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use but the use case is well-defined.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.