get_task_chain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; the description adds that results are sorted by depth, but does not disclose if it's read-only, authorization needs, or any potential side effects. The read nature is implied but not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no filler, front-loading the purpose and key details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description adequately covers purpose, input, and return structure (chain, sorted). Minor gap: no mention of output format, but acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value beyond the schema by clarifying that the task_id parameter can be any task ID in the chain, not just the root. Schema coverage is 100%, and the description enriches the parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves the full delegation chain (root plus all descendants, sorted by depth) for a task, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_task or list_tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly mentions to inspect parent/child accountability, providing clear usage context. However, it does not explicitly exclude alternative scenarios or mention when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.