create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The tool has no annotations, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It only states 'create', which implies mutation, but provides no details about side effects, permissions, or the response format. The agent cannot infer whether the operation is safe or destructive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it omits critical information. It is not needlessly verbose, but the brevity comes at the cost of completeness. The structure is simple but insufficiently informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (6 parameters, including optional fields like project_id and labels) and the absence of an output schema, the description should provide more context about task creation behavior (e.g., defaults, response). It fails to compensate for the lack of annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 6 parameters. The description adds no additional semantics beyond the schema, but the schema itself is clear. A baseline of 3 is appropriate since the schema carries the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new task in Delega' clearly states the verb (create) and resource (task). However, it does not distinguish this operation from sibling tools like assign_task or delegate_task, which also involve tasks. The purpose is clear but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update_task, complete_task). There is no mention of prerequisites, required user roles, or context such as requiring a project_id. The description offers no usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.