sdcloud_update_anti_spam_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'Update', implying mutation, but does not disclose whether the operation is idempotent, its side effects, authentication requirements, or response format. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence that is front-loaded with the core purpose. However, it is overly minimal, sacrificing helpful details for brevity. It could be expanded slightly without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (mutation tool with a body parameter, no output schema, many siblings), the description fails to provide sufficient context. It does not clarify whether the update is full replacement or partial, nor does it help the agent differentiate from other anti-spam profile tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. The 'body' parameter description is vague ('JSON request body matching...'), and 'uuid' has no description. The description does not clarify parameter constraints or formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and the resource ('an anti-spam profile object') and identifies the identifier method ('by UUID'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like create or delete by the verb. However, it could be more specific about what aspects of the profile can be updated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., the profile must exist), nor does it contrast with create or delete operations. The agent lacks context for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.