Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
hpe-security-director-cloud-mcp

hpe-security-director-cloud-mcp

by ddivins
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

sdcloud_list_addresses

Retrieve address objects with optional pagination, filtering, and sorting to control which results are returned.

Instructions

List address objects with optional pagination, filtering, and sorting.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "sdcloud_list_addresses"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fromNoStarting index for pagination (zero-based). Default 0.
sizeNoMax results per page. 0 returns the API-imposed maximum.
countNoIf true, return only the total count, no item details.
sortbyNoSort field, e.g. sortby=(name(descending)).
filtersNoFilter conditions to apply to the results.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It implies a read-only operation but doesn't state non-destructiveness, rate limits, or return format. Lacks details on pagination defaults or data freshness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, concise but lacks structure. Key info is front-loaded, but could benefit from bullet points or separate examples. Adequate but not optimally structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 optional parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It doesn't explain pagination mechanics, default behavior, or result format. Agents need more context to use effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 5 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description adds no extra meaning beyond 'pagination, filtering, sorting'. Baseline 3 applies as schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'address objects', and mentions optional features (pagination, filtering, sorting). It distinguishes from sibling get/update/delete tools for addresses, but lacks explicit scope (e.g., all addresses in tenant?). Could be more specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like sdcloud_get_address or sdcloud_create_address. No context about prerequisites or appropriate use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools