sdcloud_delete_service
Delete a service object by providing its UUID. Removes the specified service from the Security Director Cloud configuration.
Instructions
Delete a service object by UUID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes |
Delete a service object by providing its UUID. Removes the specified service from the Security Director Cloud configuration.
Delete a service object by UUID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| uuid | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic action without disclosing effects like irreversibility, cascading deletions, permission requirements, or side effects. This is insufficient for safe usage.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with a single sentence. It front-loads the key action and object, but could benefit from additional structure like effects or examples without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the single parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate: it tells the agent to delete a service by UUID. However, it lacks context on how to obtain the UUID, confirmation of deletion, or post-deletion behavior, which is important for a destructive operation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage, and the description only mentions 'by UUID' without adding detail on format, source, or validation. The agent gains no extra meaning beyond the schema's type field.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'service object' with a specific identifier 'UUID'. It is distinct from sibling tools like sdcloud_delete_site or sdcloud_delete_anti_spam_profile. However, it lacks context on what a 'service object' is, which may be assumed but not explained.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as updating or disabling a service. There is no mention of prerequisites, consequences, or conditions for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ddivins/hpe-security-director-cloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server