sdcloud_get_sync_devices_status
Retrieve the status of a bulk device synchronization job using its sync ID.
Instructions
Get the status of a bulk device-sync job.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sync_id | Yes |
Retrieve the status of a bulk device synchronization job using its sync ID.
Get the status of a bulk device-sync job.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sync_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as idempotency, side effects, or whether it is a read-only operation. It merely states what it does without additional context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, but it may be too terse. While it is efficient, it lacks sufficient detail for an agent to fully understand the tool, earning a middle score.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has only one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal. It does not explain the expected response format or how to use the sync_id, making the context incomplete for an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has only one parameter 'sync_id' with no description, and the tool description does not elaborate on what the sync_id represents or how it should be obtained. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to add any meaning beyond the parameter name.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Get' and the resource 'status of a bulk device-sync job', making the purpose immediately clear. However, it does not differentiate from other status-getting tools like sdcloud_get_reboot_devices_status, but the resource is specific enough.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any prerequisites or context. The agent is left to infer usage from the name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ddivins/hpe-security-director-cloud-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server