sdcloud_delete_firewall_policy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. The verb 'delete' implies destructive action, but there is no information about irreversibility, authorization requirements, side effects (e.g., impact on deployments), or error conditions. The description is too minimal to guide safe usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and front-loaded. No unnecessary words. However, it is slightly too terse, missing crucial context that could be added without increasing length significantly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple CRUD nature and lack of annotations, the description is incomplete. It omits prerequisites (e.g., policy must exist), consequences (e.g., cascading deletion of rules?), and error handling. The one-parameter schema is simple, but the description should provide more operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate. It mentions 'by UUID' but does not explain the format, validation rules, or how to obtain the UUID. The parameter name 'policy_uuid' is self-explanatory, but no additional semantics are provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (delete) and resource (firewall policy) and specifies identification by UUID. It distinguishes from sibling tools like sdcloud_create_firewall_policy or sdcloud_list_firewall_policies, though it could be more explicit about scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention conditions under which deletion is allowed (e.g., policy not assigned) or any prerequisite steps. The agent has to infer usage from the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.