sdcloud_sync_devices

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It implies an async operation by returning a job id and referencing a status poll tool. However, it does not disclose potential side effects, permissions required, or error behavior. The description adds some value but lacks depth on behavioral aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states purpose, second provides post-call guidance. No unnecessary words. Efficiently structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main aspects: what the tool does, what input looks like, and what to do with the output. For a simple async sync tool, this is sufficient. Could mention 'asynchronous' explicitly, but the job id implies it. Missing output schema is fine because description explains the return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter 'body' with a generic schema description. The tool description adds 'Body typically includes a list of device UUIDs,' which clarifies the expected content beyond the schema alone. This improves understanding, so score above the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Bulk-sync devices with the controller.' It specifies the verb (sync), resource (devices), and context (controller). It also distinguishes from sibling sdcloud_get_sync_devices_status by mentioning polling for progress.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides guidance on when to use the tool and what to do after: 'Body typically includes a list of device UUIDs' and 'Returns a job id; poll sdcloud_get_sync_devices_status for progress.' It does not explicitly exclude alternatives but covers the typical workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.