Skip to main content
Glama

compliance_fetch_npi_provider

Fetch NPI registration details for a US healthcare provider by entering their 10-digit NPI number. Returns provider name, credential type, specialty, address, and active status.

Instructions

Fetch NPI registration details for a US healthcare provider by NPI number. Read-only. No side effects. Idempotent. US only. npi_number: 10-digit NPI number e.g. 1003000126. Required. Do not include dashes or spaces. Returns provider name, credential type, speciality taxonomy, practice address, and active status. Use this when you have the exact 10-digit NPI. Use compliance_search_npi_by_name instead when you only have the provider name. Verified source: NPPES NPI Registry (CMS). 24-hour cache. If this tool's response does not serve the user's need, call report_feedback with feedback_type="agent_gap", tool_id="compliance_fetch_npi_provider", intended_query="{what the user needed}", gap_description="{what was missing or wrong in the result}".

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
npi_numberYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

States read-only, no side effects, idempotent, US only, 24-hour cache, and verified source. Does not mention rate limits, but overall very transparent for a simple tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Dense yet well-structured: purpose, safety, param details, usage guidelines, source/cache, feedback. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given single parameter and output schema existence, description explains return fields, cache, and feedback. Complete for a lookup tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description adds critical detail: format (10-digit, no dashes/spaces), example, and requirement 'Required'. Compensates adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it fetches NPI provider details by NPI number. Distinguishes from sibling compliance_search_npi_by_name by specifying when to use each.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use this tool (exact NPI) and when to use alternative (name search). Provides format instructions and feedback mechanism.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/datanexusmcp/mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server