pipedrive_pipelines_get
Retrieve a single pipeline by its ID to view pipeline details for CRM management.
Instructions
Get a single pipeline by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pipeline_id | Yes | The pipeline ID to retrieve |
Retrieve a single pipeline by its ID to view pipeline details for CRM management.
Get a single pipeline by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pipeline_id | Yes | The pipeline ID to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure, but it only states the basic action. No information is given about authentication requirements, error handling, rate limits, or what happens if the pipeline ID does not exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is only 5 words, front-loaded with the action, and contains no unnecessary information. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool, the description is minimally adequate but does not explain the return value structure or possible error conditions. Given no output schema, some additional context would be beneficial.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema already describes the single parameter (pipeline_id) with a clear description 'The pipeline ID to retrieve', so the tool description adds no additional value. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema coverage is 100%.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states 'Get a single pipeline by ID', using a specific verb and resource. It clearly distinguishes from the sibling pipedrive_pipelines_list which retrieves all pipelines.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., pipedrive_pipelines_list for multiple pipelines). The description lacks any context about prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/comma-compliance/pipedrive-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server