pipedrive_filters_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. 'Get' implies a read-only operation, which is appropriate, but no further behavior (e.g., error handling, permission requirements) is described. The minimal disclosure is acceptable for a simple read but lacks depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that communicates the essential information without any unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one parameter, no output schema, and simple behavior, the description is nearly complete. It could optionally mention what a 'filter definition' contains or the response format, but the lack is not critical for a straightforward get operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage (filter_id is described). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; it only references 'by ID'. Hence, the description does not augment the schema, meeting the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a single filter definition by ID.' clearly states the action (get) and resource (filter definition). Among siblings like pipedrive_filters_list and pipedrive_filters_results, this tool is distinctively for retrieving a single definition by ID, making its purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage context is provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives like pipedrive_filters_list or pipedrive_filters_results, nor does it mention prerequisites or edge cases (e.g., handling missing IDs).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.