configure_alerts

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate non-destructive writes; description adds valuable context: changes take effect immediately, save flag persists to config file, and omitted fields are left unchanged. This goes beyond what annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, no filler. Every sentence adds distinct value: purpose, immediate effect, persistence option, and partial update behavior. Ideal length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a config update tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers purpose, behavior, and parameter handling. Missing explicit mention of return value or error states, but these are less critical for a straightforward mutation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the description adds the crucial semantic detail that omitted fields are left unchanged, which is not explicit in the schema. This clarifies partial update behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update alert/notification settings') and the resource (alerts/notifications). It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_hooks_config' by specifying 'update' rather than 'get' or 'test'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use this tool (to change settings), but does not explicitly mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives like viewing current config with get_hooks_config or testing with test_notification.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.