vibo_toggle_song_like

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds 'Confirm-gated' which highlights the confirmation requirement and preview behavior, complementing the readOnlyHint=false annotation. It does not describe auth expectations or error states, but the toggle behavior is clear.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two phrases, highly efficient and front-loaded with the primary action. Every word contributes to understanding the tool's core behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple and the schema covers parameters, but the description lacks details about the preview behavior, return values, or any side effects beyond the toggle. Confirm-gating is mentioned but not elaborated, leaving some ambiguity about the interaction flow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All five parameters are already described in the schema with full coverage. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action ('Like or unlike') on a specific resource ('a song in a section'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like vibo_add_song_to_section or vibo_remove_song_from_section. The mention of 'Confirm-gated' adds a unique behavioral identifier.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or alternative comparisons are provided. The description implies the tool is for toggling a song's like status, but does not differentiate it from vibo_update_song or note any prerequisites. Slight gap in guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.