vibo_get_notifications_count
Retrieve the count of unread Vibo notifications to see pending activity and stay informed.
Instructions
Get the count of unread Vibo notifications.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the count of unread Vibo notifications to see pending activity and stay informed.
Get the count of unread Vibo notifications.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds the specific behavioral detail that it returns the count of unread notifications, which goes beyond the readOnlyHint annotation. No contradictions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One succinct sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless read-only tool returning a simple count, the description is complete. No output schema is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; schema documentation coverage is 100% automatically. The description adds no parameter info, which is appropriate given there are none.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'count of unread Vibo notifications', distinguishing it from siblings like vibo_list_notifications which returns the full list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., vibo_list_notifications). The usage is implied by the name, but the description could mention it's a lightweight alternative to listing notifications.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/vibo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server