vibo_remove_song_from_section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the 'Confirm-gated' behavioral trait, which is not present in the annotations (only readOnlyHint=false). This signals the need for a confirmation step and hints at destructive potential. It adds value beyond the structured annotations, though it could mention the preview behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short, front-loaded sentences with zero filler. The core action and the critical confirm-gating behavior are stated efficiently. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and minimal annotations, the description is adequate but sparse. It mentions confirm-gating but doesn't explain the preview behavior or return format, leaving the agent to rely on the schema. More context on the destructive nature or workflow would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no new parameter semantics beyond reinforcing 'one or more songs' (already implied by songIds array with minItems:1). No additional detail on formats or relationships is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action ('Remove') and the resource ('one or more songs from a section'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like vibo_add_song_to_section or vibo_move_song. The scope is explicit and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a clear use case but does not explicitly contrast it with alternatives like vibo_move_song or vibo_reorder_songs. It lacks explicit 'when to use this vs. other tools' guidance, though the 'Remove' purpose makes the context obvious.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.