vibo_delete_section_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint:false, indicating a write operation. The description adds 'Confirm-gated', which informs the agent of a required confirmation step. However, it does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as irreversibility, permissions, or what happens without confirmation (though the confirm parameter description partially covers this). The added value is minimal but present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loaded with the main action and followed by a key detail. Every word earns its place; no redundancy or irrelevant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is adequate for a simple delete tool, but lacks explicit context about the confirmation flow (e.g., preview vs. actual deletion) and does not address potential irreversibility. The schema covers parameter details, but the description alone leaves some contextual gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with all four parameters described. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Delete a comment on a timeline section.' It uses a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from siblings like vibo_delete_song_comment (song comment) and vibo_comment_on_section (adding a comment).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only states the function without context, exclusions, or reference to similar tools. The name implies scope, but the description itself does not provide usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.