Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to vibo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Spotify through natural language for music discovery, playback control, library management, and playlist creation. Supports searching for music, controlling playback, managing saved tracks, and getting personalized recommendations based on mood and preferences.
      81 npm
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Spotify playback, search the catalog, and manage playlists and liked songs through natural language. Supports reading currently playing tracks, queues and devices, plus play, pause, skip, queueing, volume control, and playlist creation and editing.
      30
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables control of Spotify playback, music search, and playlist management through natural language commands. Available in both Python and Vercel implementations with comprehensive OAuth2 authentication and device management.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 42 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (song vs section vs event vs user), and the parallel export/comment/reorder tools are clearly scoped by their noun. Minor overlap exists between vibo_get_me and vibo_healthcheck (both fetch the current user) and between vibo_comment_on_song and vibo_update_song's comment field, but these are distinguishable from descriptions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently use the vibo_ prefix with snake_case verb_noun patterns (get_event, list_sections, add_song_to_section, delete_song_comment). Slight deviations like vibo_healthcheck (noun) and vibo_get_me (verb+pronoun) are minor and don't impede readability.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 42 tools the surface is heavy, well above the 16-25 borderline band, and covers many parallel resources (songs, sections, questions, users, notifications, playlists, exports) in one flat list. The scope is broad but the count feels inflated and increases selection cost for an agent.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage spans the full domain lifecycle: events (list/get/join/leave/create contact/invite/role change/remove), sections (CRUD, reorder), songs (add/remove/update/reorder/move/like/comment), planning questions, notifications, playlists and profile. Only minor gaps remain (e.g. no explicit event create/update), which agents can mostly work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive