Skip to main content
Glama

vibo_list_song_ideas_songs

Read-only

List suggested songs in a song-idea collection to retrieve songUrl, viboSongId, title, and artist for adding tracks to a section.

Instructions

List the suggested songs inside a song-idea collection (returns songUrl/viboSongId/title/artist to pass to vibo_add_song_to_section).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
skipNoNumber of items to skip, for paging (default 0).
viewNoResponse shape: "compact" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; "full" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; "full" returns Vibo's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Vibo fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.
limitNoMax items to return (default 20).
eventIdYesEvent id.
sectionIdYesSection id (from vibo_list_sections).
songIdeasIdYesThe _id from vibo_list_section_song_ideas.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.0.0
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv1.8.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / view
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Response shape: \"compact\" (default) drops fields the response already carries elsewhere; \"full\" returns every field this server understands. compact strips image/avatar URLs from the response; \"full\" returns Vibo's payload untouched. No field projection: this server has no verified record of which Vibo fields matter, and inventing one would risk dropping a field a caller needs.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "compact",
      +    "full"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Addedv1.5.3
  4. Removedv1.4.3
  5. First observedv1.3.1

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful return-shape context (songUrl/viboSongId/title/artist), but says nothing about pagination behavior, default page size, or ordering despite skip/limit being available.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence; the core action comes first and the return/pipeline detail is contained in a compact parenthetical. No wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully enumerates the returned fields and the consumer tool, and the schema documents all six parameters. It is close to complete, missing only paging/ordering expectations for a list endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so every parameter including skip, limit, and the compact/full view enum is already documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond that, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (list songs inside a song-idea collection) and names the downstream tool the results feed into. It is distinguishable from vibo_list_section_song_ideas (the parent collection list) and vibo_get_section_songs (section songs), though it does not explicitly say so.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied through the pipeline hint (results are 'to pass to vibo_add_song_to_section') and the required songIdeasId, but there is no explicit when-to-use vs. alternatives statement or exclusion guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.