Skip to main content
Glama
brilliantdirectories

brilliant-directories-mcp

Official

getMemberSubCategoryLink

Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch a single member-subcategory link by its relation ID to get full details like pricing and specialty.

Instructions

Get a single user-service relationship - Fetch a single Member ↔ Sub Category link by rel_id. Read-only.

Use when: you have a rel_id and need the full link row. Rare - most workflows query by user_id or service_id via listMemberSubCategoryLinks.

Required: rel_id.

See also: listMemberSubCategoryLinks (enumerate, filter by user_id or service_id).

Returns: { status: "success", message: [{...record}] }.

How a member gets classified on their public profile:

  • users_data.profession_id -> points at a single Top Category (the member's primary classification; shown in URL slug)

  • users_data.services -> CSV of Sub Category IDs the member is tagged with (multiple allowed; simpler than the join table)

  • rel_services rows (Member ↔ Sub Category links) -> used when you need per-link metadata like avg_price, specialty, num_completed. Optional; most sites use just the CSV field.

Sub-sub-categories: createSubCategory with master_id=<parent service_id> creates a Sub Category nested under another Sub Category (a "sub-sub"). master_id=0 (default) means the Sub Category sits directly under a Top Category (the profession_id).

There is NO createProfession or createService tool in this MCP — those are BD's internal table names. Use createTopCategory / createSubCategory instead (BD's table-name → tool-name mapping is documented in Rule: Table to endpoint).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rel_idYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare read-only. The description reinforces this ('Read-only') and adds return format details ('{ status: "success", message: [{...record}] }'). No contradictions; adds value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with sections, but contains extensive tangential background on member classification and sub-sub-categories that is not directly relevant to using this tool. This extra content reduces conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite a simple parameter set and no output schema, the description provides return format, use cases, and related concepts. The extra background adds completeness for understanding context, though not strictly necessary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description compensates by naming the required parameter ('rel_id'), noting it is required, and explaining its role ('by rel_id'). Since only one simple parameter, this is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action ('Get'/'Fetch'), the resource ('Member ↔ Sub Category link'), and the key parameter ('rel_id'). It distinguishes from the sibling 'listMemberSubCategoryLinks' by noting the scope difference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly specifies when to use ('when you have a rel_id'), rarity, and provides an explicit alternative ('listMemberSubCategoryLinks' for enumeration/filtering). Also notes common workflow patterns.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/brilliantdirectories/brilliant-directories-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server