Set Forms submit-button conditions operator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare that this is a non-read-only, idempotent, non-destructive mutation (readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false). The description adds the scope ('between the submit button's condition groups') but discloses no further behavioral traits such as permission requirements or side effects beyond what the annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. The key action and scope are immediately clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter, no-output setter with full schema coverage and annotations covering safety, the description is nearly sufficient. The main omission is explicit usage guidance relative to siblings, but the core action and scope are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented in the schema. The description mentions the operator implicitly but adds no syntax, format, or additional meaning beyond the schema's own descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Set') and a precise resource ('boolean operator BETWEEN the submit button's condition groups'). It distinguishes this tool from sibling operator updaters for question, page, and hook conditions, as well as from the general submit-condition update tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as forms_conditions_submit_update or the other *_update_operator siblings. Usage is only implied by the narrow action and name, with no explicit context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.