pricing_toggle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must carry the behavioral disclosure burden. It only says the toggle is 'created' with 'animated price transitions'; it does not state whether this returns code, writes files, requires an API key, or performs any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is concise, front-loaded, and free of filler. It communicates the core purpose quickly, though the brevity contributes to the overall under-specification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and four parameters, this description is incomplete. It fails to explain what the generated toggle looks like, how the framework parameter affects output, what the actual deliverable is, or whether authentication via api_key is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25% and the description barely compensates. 'Monthly/annual' loosely maps to annual_discount_percent, but the description does not explain animation choices, framework options, or how the discount is applied. The schema's undocumented parameters remain unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Create a monthly/annual pricing toggle' with 'animated price transitions.' It is clear about what the tool produces, but it does not differentiate from related siblings like pricing_table_component or feature_comparison_matrix.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention related tools such as pricing_table_component or feature_comparison_matrix, nor does it provide any context about when a toggle is the right choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.