get_incomplete_subtasks_by_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, indicating safe, repeatable behavior. The description adds no further behavioral context, such as the format or structure of the returned incomplete subtasks. Given the annotation coverage, a score of 3 is appropriate; no contradiction, but the description does not enhance transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence of 6 words with no redundancy. It is front-loaded and every word serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description should ideally explain what is returned (e.g., a list of subtask objects, what fields they contain, or how 'incomplete' is defined). The current description lacks this information, leaving the agent uncertain about the return structure. However, the simplicity of the tool (single parameter, read-only) and annotations partially compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter 'task_id' described as 'Task ID'. The description does not add any additional meaning or constraints beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get incomplete subtasks for specific task' clearly identifies the verb (get), resource (incomplete subtasks), and scope (for a specific task using task_id). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'get_incomplete_subtasks' (all incomplete subtasks) and 'get_subtasks_by_task' (all subtasks for a task).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not advise using this tool over 'get_subtasks_by_task' when only incomplete subtasks are needed, or to prefer 'get_incomplete_subtasks' when task_id is not available. The decision is left to inference from the name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.