get_incomplete_subtasks
Find which subtasks remain incomplete, allowing you to prioritize and manage project progress.
Instructions
Get all non-completed subtasks
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Find which subtasks remain incomplete, allowing you to prioritize and manage project progress.
Get all non-completed subtasks
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, indicating a safe query. The description adds little beyond the filter 'non-completed' and does not elaborate on what constitutes completion or other behavioral details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise with a single sentence that clearly conveys the purpose. No unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple getter with no parameters. However, without an output schema, the description could hint at what fields are returned. The context of sibling tools is strong, but the description does not leverage it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so there is nothing to explain. Schema coverage is 100%, meeting the baseline for zero parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it retrieves non-completed subtasks. However, it does not specify the scope (e.g., all tasks globally vs. a specific task), which could be ambiguous given sibling tools like get_incomplete_subtasks_by_task.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_incomplete_subtasks_by_task or get_subtasks_comprehensive. The description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aryanduntley/aimfp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server