Skip to main content
Glama

photoshop_select_layer_by_name

Idempotent

Select a layer in Photoshop by its exact name, even inside groups, to make it the active layer for transforms or property edits.

Instructions

Select the active layer by exact name, including layers inside groups.

Use when: a transform or property tool must target a named layer (photoshop_scale_layer, etc.). Do NOT use when: the layer is already active — check photoshop_get_state first.

Returns: selected, layerName, kind, bounds (best-effort), context. First depth-first name match wins when duplicate names exist in different groups. Preconditions: active document. Side effects: changes active layer.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesExact layer name (case-sensitive)
document_idYesPhotoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.33
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.7.32
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. When set, the tool activates that document before running so a UI tab switch cannot retarget the edit."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "name"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "name",
      +  "document_id"
      +]
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations: it declares the precondition (active document), the side effect (changes the active layer), and a tie-breaking rule for duplicate names that annotations cannot express. The disclosed mutation matches readOnlyHint=false and the deterministic first-match rule is consistent with idempotentHint=true, so nothing is contradicted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Labeled sections (Use when / Do NOT use when / Returns / Preconditions / Side effects) front-load the routing decision, and each line carries distinct information. No filler sentences or restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description compensates by enumerating the return fields (selected, layerName, kind, bounds, context). Preconditions, side effects, and duplicate-name behavior are all covered, so an agent has everything needed to call this correctly in a multi-step transform workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already carries both parameters (name case-sensitivity, document_id null/0 semantics), making 3 the baseline. The description adds genuine value on top by specifying that the first depth-first name match wins when duplicates exist across groups — resolution semantics absent from the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (select) and resource (active layer by exact name), plus a non-obvious scope detail: layers nested inside groups are reachable. An agent can distinguish this from siblings like photoshop_rename_layer, photoshop_get_layers, or the set_active_artboard tools without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit 'Use when' names the downstream consumers (photoshop_scale_layer and other transform/property tools), and 'Do NOT use when' gives the exclusion condition with the exact alternative to run first (photoshop_get_state to check whether the layer is already active). Both the positive and negative routing cases are covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools