Skip to main content
Glama

photoshop_deselect

Idempotent

Clears the current pixel selection in Photoshop, leaving all pixels unchanged. Use it to remove a selection before the next edit.

Instructions

Clear the current pixel selection. Pixels are unchanged.

Use when: a selection should be cleared before the next edit. Do NOT use when: you want the inverse region selected — use photoshop_invert_selection. Do NOT use when: you want every pixel selected — use photoshop_select_all.

Returns: confirmation that the selection was cleared. Preconditions: active document. Safe when nothing is selected. Side effects: selection only. Idempotent. Reversible with photoshop_undo if a selection existed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
document_idYesPhotoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.33
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.7.32
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. When set, the tool activates that document before running so a UI tab switch cannot retarget the edit."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "document_id"
      +]
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds substantial context: pixels are unchanged, side effects are limited to selection, it is safe when nothing is selected, and it is reversible via photoshop_undo if a selection existed. These details go well beyond the annotations and align with readOnlyHint=false without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, followed by clearly labeled usage, return, precondition, and side-effect sections. Every line is useful, especially the return note since no output schema exists.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple selection-clearing tool, the description covers purpose, sibling routing, return value, preconditions, side effects, and reversibility. Nothing an agent needs in order to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single document_id parameter has 100% schema description coverage, so the schema already explains accepted values and active-document behavior. The description adds only the precondition 'active document,' which is already implied by the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Clear the current pixel selection.' It explicitly distinguishes itself from photoshop_invert_selection and photoshop_select_all, so an agent can route correctly without opening sibling schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit 'Use when' guidance and two 'Do NOT use when' exclusions with named alternatives. This fully covers when to use this tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools