Skip to main content
Glama

photoshop_convert_to_smart_object

Convert the active or a named Photoshop layer into an embedded Smart Object for non-destructive transforms and filters. Requires an unlocked layer that isn't already a Smart Object.

Instructions

Convert the active layer (or a named layer) to an embedded Smart Object.

Users often say: convert to smart object, make smart layer, embed layer.

Use when: non-destructive transforms/filters are needed on a raster or shape layer. Do NOT use when: the layer is already a Smart Object — returns success with already_smart_object. Do NOT use on background layers — unlock or duplicate first.

Returns: JSON { ok, summary, details: { layer_name, kind, already_smart_object? } }. Preconditions: active document; target layer must be selected or named. Side effects: one history step.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
layer_nameNoOptional exact layer name (recursive search). Default: active layer.
document_idYesPhotoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.33
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.7.32
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. When set, the tool activates that document before running so a UI tab switch cannot retarget the edit."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "document_id"
      +]
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the safety profile (readOnly=false, destructive=false, idempotent=false). The description goes further, disclosing the already_smart_object no-op path, the background-layer restriction, preconditions (active document, layer selected or named) and side effects (one history step), which the annotations cannot express.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action, then segmented into Use when / Do NOT use / Returns / Preconditions / Side effects. Every sentence carries actionable information and none is filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, but the description supplies the return shape (ok, summary, details with layer_name, kind, already_smart_object?), plus preconditions and side effects. Nothing needed to call this mutation correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so layer_name and document_id are fully documented in the schema itself. The description restates the active-layer default but adds no format or edge-case detail beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (convert) and resource (active or named layer to embedded Smart Object), which cleanly separates it from siblings like photoshop_create_smart_object_via_copy and photoshop_rasterize_layer. An agent can identify the operation without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit 'Use when' (non-destructive transforms/filters on raster or shape layers) plus two 'Do NOT use' exclusions (already-Smart-Object layers, background layers), each with the resulting behavior or remedy. It also lists common user phrasings, which aids intent matching.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools