Skip to main content
Glama

photoshop_apply_gradient_map

Add a Gradient Map adjustment layer to remap tones for duotone or black-and-white looks, with optional reversed white-to-black gradient.

Instructions

Create a Gradient Map adjustment layer (black→white by default) for duotone/B&W tonal remapping.

Users often say: duotone look, gradient map B&W, remap tones.

Returns: JSON { ok, summary, details: { layer_name, reverse } }. Preconditions: active document. Side effects: adds a Gradient Map adjustment layer.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
reverseNoReverse the gradient (white→black)
document_idYesPhotoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.33
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.7.32
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. When set, the tool activates that document before running so a UI tab switch cannot retarget the edit."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "document_id"
      +]
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the description's added value is the explicit side effect ('adds a Gradient Map adjustment layer'), the precondition, and the return shape. It does not explain that repeated calls stack additional layers (consistent with idempotentHint=false) or how existing pixel data is affected, so it is solid but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action and its purpose, then compact labeled lines for Returns and Preconditions/Side effects. The 'Users often say' line is slightly colloquial but earns its place as intent-matching aid; no sentence is pure filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully documents the JSON return shape, and it covers preconditions and side effects for a mutation tool. Missing only edge-case behavior (layer stacking on repeat calls, whether it targets the active layer or the whole document), which is minor for a two-parameter adjustment tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents both document_id (including the null/0 active-document behavior) and reverse. The description only adds the default gradient direction (black→white) and echoes 'reverse' in the return payload, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a precise verb + resource ('Create a Gradient Map adjustment layer') plus its functional intent ('duotone/B&W tonal remapping'), which implicitly separates it from pixel-level siblings like photoshop_fill_gradient and from photoshop_apply_lut or photoshop_desaturate. An agent can identify the operation without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Supplies concrete user-intent triggers ('duotone look, gradient map B&W, remap tones') that make routing decisions easy, and states the precondition of an active document. It stops short of naming alternatives (e.g., desaturate or LUT for B&W conversion) or when-not to use it, so it is clear context without exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools