Skip to main content
Glama

photoshop_auto_levels

Destructive

Run Auto Levels on the active layer to fix flat images by setting black, white, and gray points automatically. Use for a one-shot tone correction; undo reverts it.

Instructions

Run Auto Levels on the active layer. Photoshop sets the black, white, and gray points; there is no amount parameter.

Users often say: fix flat image, auto tone, make it pop (mild).

Use when: a one-shot automatic level fix on the current layer. Do NOT use when: only contrast should move — use photoshop_auto_contrast. Do NOT use when: you want a specific brightness and contrast delta — use photoshop_adjust_brightness_contrast. Do NOT use when: the correction must stay an editable adjustment layer — use photoshop_adjust_curves.

Returns: confirmation that Auto Levels ran. Preconditions: active document and active layer. Text and Smart Objects are rasterized first. Side effects: destructive pixels, one history step. Reversible with photoshop_undo.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
document_idYesPhotoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.7.33
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null or 0 to use the active document. A positive number activates that document before the tool runs. When no document is open, a stale id does not block the call."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.7.32
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / description
      Previous value: -"Optional Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. When set, the tool activates that document before running so a UI tab switch cannot retarget the edit."New value: +"Photoshop document id from photoshop_get_state / photoshop_list_documents. Send null to use the active document. A number activates that document before the tool runs."
    • changedInput schema / properties / document_id / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • addedInput schema / required
      Added value: +[
      +  "document_id"
      +]
  3. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, but the description adds substantial context beyond them: text and Smart Objects are rasterized first, the edit is destructive to pixels, it consumes one history step, it is reversible via photoshop_undo, and it has no amount parameter. That is exactly the kind of pre-call behavioral disclosure an agent needs before a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads purpose, then layers intent phrasing, usage routing, return value, preconditions, and side effects in labeled blocks. Every line is actionable; no filler or repetition of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Though there is no output schema, the description states the return ('confirmation that Auto Levels ran'), the preconditions (active document and layer), the side effects, and the undo path. Nothing an agent needs to call this safely is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single document_id parameter is fully documented in the schema, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by explicitly stating 'there is no amount parameter', preempting an agent from searching for an intensity control — a real clarification beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Run Auto Levels on the active layer') and immediately defines the operation's semantics (Photoshop sets black, white, and gray points). It explicitly distinguishes itself from three close siblings (auto_contrast, adjust_brightness_contrast, adjust_curves), so an agent can route correctly without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit 'Use when' plus three 'Do NOT use when' clauses, each naming the alternative tool and the condition that selects it. It also maps colloquial user phrasings ('fix flat image', 'auto tone', 'make it pop') to the tool, closing the intent-matching gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools