keyso_post_clustering

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that a task is created and gives the HTTP method and path, without mentioning asynchronous behavior, required authentication, side effects, or how the task should be monitored. This is minimal and incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, free of filler, and front-loads the core action before the method and path. The method and path information is useful because the schema does not expose the endpoint. It is slightly too terse to be a perfect 5, but it is well structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and an empty body schema, the description should at least explain what to put in the body and how to track the created task via sibling tools like keyso_get_clustering_state_uid. It does neither, so a caller cannot reliably construct a valid request or interpret the result.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents token and base_url and labels body as 'JSON body', giving high nominal coverage. However, the description adds no parameter-level meaning, and the body object remains empty and arbitrary, so the most important request content is still undefined. The high schema coverage keeps this at baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says the action is 'создание задания' (creating a task/job) on the /clustering endpoint, which names a specific verb and resource. This separates it from the many get/list/delete clustering siblings, though it does not explicitly contrast it with keyso_post_clustering_uid_build.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as keyso_get_clustering_state_uid or keyso_post_clustering_uid_build. There are no prerequisites, exclusions, or follow-up steps described, so an agent receives no routing help.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.