keyso_get_report_simple_links_outlinks_domains

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only supplies the resource name, Method GET, Path, and a sample URL. It does not mention whether the result is a paginated list, what fields are returned, or any other operational behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with the resource name, followed by Method, Path, and a concrete example. It has no filler or redundant prose, though it sacrifices explanatory depth for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 7-parameter endpoint with no output schema and no annotations, this description is thin. It does not describe the returned data shape, pagination behavior, or the report context, leaving an agent to guess what it will get beyond the URL construction.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents all parameters, so the baseline is 3. The example request adds practical value by showing how domain, sort with URL-encoded `backlinks_count|desc`, page, and per_page are combined into a real call, which is useful beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource ('Исходящие домены' / outgoing domains) and provides the HTTP method and path, so an agent can infer this is a GET for outlink domains. However, it lacks an explicit verb and does not clearly state what the response represents, nor does it differentiate this from the many sibling outlink/backlink domain endpoints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this endpoint instead of alternatives such as keyso_get_report_simple_links_outlinks, keyso_get_report_simple_links_outlinks__154bc0f2, or keyso_get_report_simple_links_backlinks_domains. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context to help an agent choose correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.