keyso_get_robots_data

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must carry the behavioral burden. It does indicate this is a GET request, implying a read-only operation, and shows the request path. However, it leaves response format, auth behavior, error cases, and rate-limit implications implicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, front-loaded with purpose, then method/path, then a concrete example. Every sentence earns its place and there is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only data tool, the schema plus the GET endpoint and example are mostly sufficient to call it. However, there is no output schema and the description does not clarify the response shape, nor does it connect this tool to keyso_get_robots_dates for date discovery.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all four parameters, including the date fallback behavior and token/base_url overrides. The tool description adds only a domain example URL and no extra parameter semantics, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource: robots.txt file data for a given domain and date, with an endpoint path and example request. It does not explicitly contrast this with the sibling keyso_get_robots_dates, so differentiation is mostly carried by the tool name and the word 'data'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the use case: fetch robots.txt data for a domain, optionally for a particular date. It provides an example request but gives no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and does not point to keyso_get_robots_dates as the way to discover available dates.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.