keyso_delete_wordstat_delete_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral transparency burden. It reveals that the operation is destructive via 'DELETE' and 'удаление', but it does not disclose what exactly is removed, whether deletion cascades to related data, whether authentication is required, or whether the operation is idempotent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, with no wasted words. However, the brevity is closer to under-specification than effective conciseness, because it omits the essential request-body details needed to invoke the tool correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and a schema whose body has no defined properties, the description is not complete enough. The endpoint is clear, but the absence of any information about how to identify the project and what the response will be leaves a significant gap for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes token and base_url, but the critical body parameter is an empty 'additionalProperties' object with no documented project identifier. The description does not explain how or where the project to delete is specified, so an agent cannot determine the required request payload.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a concrete action ('удаление проекта' – deleting a project) and the resource it acts on, reinforced by the explicit DELETE method and path. Among sibling Wordstat tools, this is clearly distinct from creating/updating projects and from deleting words.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to choose this tool instead of related tools such as keyso_post_wordstat_create_project, keyso_post_wordstat_id_update_project, or keyso_delete_wordstat_delete_words. Usage context is only implied by the DELETE verb and endpoint path.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.