keyso_get_tools_dictionary_by_pages_state_uid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'status of report processing' and provides the HTTP method/path, without stating that the call is read-only, what the possible status values are, whether it supports polling, or how errors like an unknown UID are handled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the purpose, then gives method, path, and an example. Every sentence earns its place, though it is terse rather than richly informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-required-param GET endpoint, the definition is minimal but incomplete: it lacks the relationship to the POST counterpart, return-value semantics, expected statuses, and any guidance on when to poll. An agent can construct the URL but not fully understand the endpoint's place in the workflow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents uid, token, and base_url. The description adds an example UID value and full path, which is mildly helpful, but it does not add meaningful semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific resource ('Словарь слов по страницам') and operation ('статус обработки отчета'), so an agent can tell this is a status-check endpoint for a dictionary-by-pages report. It does not explicitly distinguish it from the similar sibling keyso_get_tools_dictionary_ext_by_page_state_uid, but the path and name make the target resource clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to call this endpoint, such as after submitting a report via keyso_post_tools_dictionary_by_pages, or how it relates to polling state. The example URL is useful but does not explain usage context or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.